Xlk compare.

Holdings. Compare ETFs XLK and IYW on performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs and ESG ratings. Nov 30, 2023 · XLK vs. IYW - Performance Comparison. In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's 36.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLK having a 18.57% annualized return and IYW not far behind at 18.31%. The chart below displays the growth of a ... VGT vs. XLK - Performance Comparison. In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 49.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VGT having a 19.80% annualized return and XLK not far ahead at 20.08%. The chart below displays the growth of a ...As of November 30, 2023. Returns for periods of 1 year and above are annualized. Annual Total Returns Versus Peers. Show Benchmark Comparison.

Opening an XLK file in Excel works just like when opening a normal workbook. This means you can use Excel's File > Save As menu to convert one to any of Excel's other formats. LibreOffice Calc supports some of the same formats as Excel. You can convert an XLK file in Calc by opening the file and then using the File > Save As …Holdings. Compare ETFs QQQ and XLK on performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs and ESG ratings.

CompareAmazon.com AMZN, Tesla TSLA, Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund XLK and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF IWF. Get comparison charts for tons of financial metrics!Why Are Tech Stocks Rallying In 2023? In a year in which the S&P 500 ( SPY) is up only marginally and the S&P Bank index ( KBE) is down nearly 20%, the Technology Select Sector ETF (NYSEARCA: XLK ...

Over the past 10 years, XLG has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 13.12%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.96% annualized …Historical Performance: VGT vs XLK. XLK was launched back in 1998, while VGT was launched in 2004. Since the VGT’s launch, the two funds have performed incredibly similarly, with an annualized difference of only .08%! The cumulative performance differential over that timeframe is roughly 10%.QQQ vs XLK based on their price, market capitalisation, dividend yield and more. Benchmark performance to make better investment decisions.Fund Size Comparison. Both FSELX and XLK have a similar number of assets under management. FSELX has 3.77 Billion in assets under management, while XLK has 29.3 Billion . Minafi categorizes both of these funds as large funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund.

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) Compare. Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund 170.54 ‎-1.81%

The table below compares many ETF metrics between XLK and XLK. Compare fees, performance, dividend yield, holdings, technical indicators, and many other metrics to …

{"payload":{"allShortcutsEnabled":false,"fileTree":{"":{"items":[{"name":"PM - AI ETFs Analysis.R","path":"PM - AI ETFs Analysis.R","contentType":"file"},{"name ...IBB vs. XLK: Head-To-Head ETF Comparison. The table below compares many ETF metrics between IBB and XLK. Compare fees, performance, dividend yield, holdings, technical indicators, and many other metrics to make a better investment decision. Overview. QQQ vs. XLK: Head-To-Head ETF Comparison The table below compares many ETF metrics between QQQ and XLK. Compare fees, performance, dividend yield, holdings, technical indicators, and many other metrics to make a better investment decision.Learn how key attributes of this fund could factor into your decision-making. OK. Visit Portfolio Tool. How To Buy. Add to Compare Go to Compare. NAV as of Dec ...IYW vs. XLK: Head-To-Head ETF Comparison The table below compares many ETF metrics between IYW and XLK. Compare fees, performance, dividend yield, holdings, technical indicators, and many other metrics to make a better investment decision.Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund is a equity fund issued by SSgA. XLK focuses on information technology investments and follows the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund's investments total to approximately $54.94 billion assets under management.

SOXX lags XLK, a broad-based large-cap tech fund, on this measure over every period longer than three months. Given the downside risk potential, SOXX should feature better fundamentals than XLK.Fund Size Comparison. Both VGT and XLK have a similar number of assets under management. VGT has 33.6 Billion in assets under management, while XLK has 29.3 Billion . Minafi categorizes both of these funds as large funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund.While both funds are quite large and liquid, there’s a notable difference between the two on these factors: Size: QQQ has $148 billion in AUM compared to $36 billion for the XLK. Trading liquidity: Both funds are very liquid: QQQ trades an average of 56.7 million shares daily compared to the XLK’s 6.9 million.TAKEAWAYS. VGT, QQQ & XLK represent the most popular ETFs in the tech space. Vanguard’s VGT has the lowest fees at 0.10%; QQQ has the highest fees at 0.20%. All ETFs have significant exposure to AAPL, with XLKs weightage coming in at 22.79% for this equity. VGT is the most diverse ETF as this fund includes small, mid & …Fund Size Comparison. Both VGT and XLK have a similar number of assets under management. VGT has 33.6 Billion in assets under management, while XLK has 29.3 Billion . Minafi categorizes both of these funds as large funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund.

Holdings. Compare ETFs VGT and FTEC on performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs and ESG ratings.The example below shows the Consumer Discretionary SPDR (XLY) with the S&P 500 as the benchmark. Keep in mind that any symbol can be used to measure relative performance. If you want to compare the performance of the Consumer Discretionary SPDR (XLY) to the Technology SPDR (XLK), simply enter XLK as the parameter and click update.

We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Nov 21, 2023 · To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NVDA is a Hold and XLK is a Buy. Both XLK and ONEQ are considered high-volume assets. They’re less likely to be affected by issues like slippage and failed orders on Composer than low-volume assets. XLK has more assets under management than ONEQ by $42,718,585,749. Higher AUM can be associated with better liquidity and lower slippage in trading. QQQ vs XLK: The expense ratio of QQQ is 0.20% and XLK is 0.10%. QQQ’s biggest holding is Microsoft Corp and XLK’s biggest holding is Microsoft Corp. Overall, QQQ has provided -0.56% Lower returns than XLK over the past ten years. In this article, we’ll compare QQQ vs XLK. We’ll look at holdings and performance, as well as at their ...search Compare to. Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund. $35.90. XLF 1.13%. Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund. $70.66. ... XLK 0.15%. Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund. $168.78.The fund invests in the who’s-who of the U.S. tech sector, with major holdings in companies like Apple and IBM. The fund splits its assets mainly between the technology and communication services sectors, while allocating mainly to giant and large cap firms. One of the major strengths of this ETF is the fact that it does not single out a ...XLK. + expensive ratio 0.12% vs. 0.20% of QQQ. + is not limited to Nasdaq companies can be any company that in the future is better and is not on Nasdaq. + price is lower. I like to treat XLK as a stock, I like to invest in apple and Microsoft, but I set out to only invest only in ETFS, so I see this ETF as investing in these companies directly ...Dec 1, 2023 · XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSPTX or XLK. XLK moved to a new high in September, but the AD Volume Line did not confirm this high and formed a lower high. This bearish divergence reflected weaker buying pressure on the September advance. Second, there was a bullish divergence in April. Notice how XLK dipped below its early April low in late April, but the AD Volume Line formed a higher low.

XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSCSX or XLK.

AMD : 119.49 (-1.68%) Tech sector ETF XLK edges closer to breakout level MarketBeat - Mon Nov 6, 7:45AM CST. Despite recent selling pressure, the XLK ETF remains up almost 37% year-to-date, and the ETF was last trading near the high end of its bullish consolidation. AAPL : 191.06 (-0.20%)

The best way to determine this is to compare performance to a broad-base ETF that represents the entire sector. Either IYW or XLK can be used, although IYW is a superior choice.This in turn will shift the balance of power in favor of XLC. For this purpose, its price-to-earnings ratio of 16.7x is much less than XLK's 23 which means that its holdings do not have to ...XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSCSX or XLK.While both funds are quite large and liquid, there’s a notable difference between the two on these factors: Size: QQQ has $148 billion in AUM compared to $36 billion for the XLK. Trading liquidity: Both funds are very liquid: QQQ trades an average of 56.7 million shares daily compared to the XLK’s 6.9 million.12. Compare and contrast: FSPTX vs XLK. FSPTX is a mutual fund, whereas XLK is an ETF. FSPTX has a lower 5-year return than XLK (16.37% vs 19.41%). FSPTX has a higher expense ratio than XLK (0.67% vs 0.1%).ARKF is an actively managed Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) that seeks long-term growth of capital. It seeks to achieve this investment objective by investing under normal circumstances primarily (at least 80% of its assets) in domestic and foreign equity securities of companies that are engaged in the Fund s investment theme of financial technology ( Fintech ) innovation. Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund is a equity fund issued by SSgA. XLK focuses on information technology investments and follows the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund's investments total to approximately $54.94 …XLK is also a short solid target due to its lack of a substantial dividend, immense market liquidity, immaterial borrowing cost, and low short-squeeze risk due to the common short interest in most ...Fund Size Comparison. Both SCHX and XLK have a similar number of assets under management. SCHX has 19 Billion in assets under management, while XLK has 29.3 Billion . Minafi categorizes both of these funds as large funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund.Nov 28, 2023 · The fund invests in the who’s-who of the U.S. tech sector, with major holdings in companies like Apple and IBM. The fund splits its assets mainly between the technology and communication services sectors, while allocating mainly to giant and large cap firms. One of the major strengths of this ETF is the fact that it does not single out a ... ETF Stock Exposure Tool. Easily find all U.S.-listed equity ETFs with significant exposure to a particular security. Compare 2,000+ ETFs by dozens of different criteria, including expense ratio, AUM, and investment objective.Many investors compare VGT vs XLK because they are so similar. The funds are quite similar with one important difference. A quick reminder that this site does NOT provide investment recommendations. Fund comparisons (such as this one) are not conducted to identify the “best” fund (since that will vary from investor to investor based on ...

Compare. SPICE. Created with Highcharts 7.1.2 ... Ticker: XLK. No index-linked product details are currently available. Load All. This list includes investable ...Fund Size Comparison. Both VGT and XLK have a similar number of assets under management. VGT has 33.6 Billion in assets under management, while XLK has 29.3 Billion . Minafi categorizes both of these funds as large funds. Fund size is a good indication of how many other investors trust this fund.For comparison, XLK owns 67 stocks, and its top 10 holdings make up 69.9% of the fund, while QQQ owns 102 stocks, and its top 10 holdings account for 48.3% of the fund.Instagram:https://instagram. jnj ex dividend date 2023set index todayhow to get into real estate investing with little moneybest month for stocks SMH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison. VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 4.92%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of ... best short term disability insurance for self employedvxus compare Get the latest Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) real-time quote, historical performance, charts, and other financial information to help you make more informed trading and investment ... Holdings. Compare ETFs VGT and FTEC on performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs and ESG ratings. best mutual fund broker SOXX's most recent quarterly earnings surprise is only slightly better than XLK's (8.26% vs. 7.68%), and contrary to Nvidia's situation, Wall Street analysts are not optimistic about most of the ...Technology stocks were mixed premarket Wednesday, with the SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) inactive and the Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) …